看到sidekick寫關於12.4的宣傳海報,我忽然明白很多以前不明的事,尤其關於一些法律觀點問題:
- 關於打劫﹕大佬,咁我窮丫嘛!fair use,你識唔識?我借你D錢,又冇話唔還!
- 關於偷竊﹕喂,我肚餓偷個包食唧!fair use,你識唔識?擺得出路面就預左俾人偷!
- 關於非禮/強姦﹕喇,我性慾強啵!fair use,你識唔識?著得咁性感,預左俾人搞/姦啦!
哦,fair use丫嘛!我完全明白了!
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright(批評、評論、新聞報導、教學(包括在課堂上分發多份拷貝)、學術交流或研究之目的). In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
- the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
- the nature of the copyrighted work;
- the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
- the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
不要動不動就說Fair use﹐Fair use有特定的規範﹐讀清楚內容才再引用﹗不清不楚就亂說一通﹐會被人恥笑的﹗
關於12.4大遊行海報設計
[...] 再問兩句: 點解要咁做?(非要用某一個原創作品再創作不可?為何不自行創作?)的概念是甚麼?跟原作品的概念有何關係嗎?) 12.4 大遊行,為的是甚麼?當我們如此注重立法,尊重法律精神的時候, 那麼版權法、原創的精神,我們也不容忽視罷? trackbacked from: Also Sprach Blacksnow:抄襲風波停不了 Can you hear me…:無天理 Kyokoap:Friday, December 02, 2005 EastSouthWestNorth Blog:Section 1 of 3:Photos/Reading 大雄網站:哦!我完全明白了! | | [...]
我在此引過你的佐證, 因此覺得好似需要話聲你知:
http://www.iblacksnow.com/blog/?p=359
sidekick太有禮啦!:)