<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 「南蓮園池」新增規條</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790</link>
	<description>關於我自己，一切生活瑣碎事</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 大雄</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17899</link>
		<dc:creator>大雄</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17899</guid>
		<description>@Monster, 我稔未賭就已經俾人“勸喻”離開囉﹗</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Monster, 我稔未賭就已經俾人“勸喻”離開囉﹗</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monster</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17893</link>
		<dc:creator>Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17893</guid>
		<description>哈哈，咁千祈唔好係果度賭錢 XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>哈哈，咁千祈唔好係果度賭錢 XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 大雄</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17853</link>
		<dc:creator>大雄</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17853</guid>
		<description>@Monster, 我以前去過, 唔知點解係有種「周身唔聚財」既感覺。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Monster, 我以前去過, 唔知點解係有種「周身唔聚財」既感覺。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monster</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17848</link>
		<dc:creator>Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17848</guid>
		<description>可能真係因為之前中過招先咁嚴卦...
哈哈，看來要去果度實地考察一次先得。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>可能真係因為之前中過招先咁嚴卦&#8230;<br />
哈哈，看來要去果度實地考察一次先得。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 大雄</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17805</link>
		<dc:creator>大雄</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17805</guid>
		<description>@Monster, 其實係唔係中過招先咁嚴格呢? 但我又唔明, 一個公園設計到無辦法拍團體照, 冇辦法走回頭路, 咁窄既路徑當初邊個設計架??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Monster, 其實係唔係中過招先咁嚴格呢? 但我又唔明, 一個公園設計到無辦法拍團體照, 冇辦法走回頭路, 咁窄既路徑當初邊個設計架??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 大雄</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17802</link>
		<dc:creator>大雄</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17802</guid>
		<description>@Nefuis, 其實「南蓮園池」也不大, 沒必要聘請太多保安員, 而且如此害怕園池內的物件會損毀, 倒不如不開放啦!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nefuis, 其實「南蓮園池」也不大, 沒必要聘請太多保安員, 而且如此害怕園池內的物件會損毀, 倒不如不開放啦!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monster</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17801</link>
		<dc:creator>Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17801</guid>
		<description>我諗，個公園的管理人係咪當d 遊人係不負責任的人？他們好像假定了遊人做甚麼，也會破壞環境似的....那可不是私人花園哦...最令人大惑不解是為何寫生和拍團體照也不行.....若怕阻塞通道，或者做人流管制便行啦...真奇怪</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我諗，個公園的管理人係咪當d 遊人係不負責任的人？他們好像假定了遊人做甚麼，也會破壞環境似的&#8230;.那可不是私人花園哦&#8230;最令人大惑不解是為何寫生和拍團體照也不行&#8230;..若怕阻塞通道，或者做人流管制便行啦&#8230;真奇怪</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nefuis</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17798</link>
		<dc:creator>Nefuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17798</guid>
		<description>「南蓮監獄」--- 很貼切的形容。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>「南蓮監獄」&#8212; 很貼切的形容。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nefuis</title>
		<link>http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17797</link>
		<dc:creator>Nefuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daihung.com/blog/2008/03/31/3790#comment-17797</guid>
		<description>真的, 令人很懷疑那兒的保安員之前都是在懲教署當獄卒。
還有, 就是他們"效率"之高, 令人傻了眼。 
「南蓮監獄」</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>真的, 令人很懷疑那兒的保安員之前都是在懲教署當獄卒。<br />
還有, 就是他們&#8221;效率&#8221;之高, 令人傻了眼。<br />
「南蓮監獄」</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
